The number e is a famous irrational number, and is one of the most significant numbers in mathematics.
The very first few digits are:
Two.7182818284590452353602874713527 (and more . )
It is often called Euler’s number after Leonhard Euler.
e is the base of the Natural Logarithms (invented by John Napier).
e is found in many interesting areas, so it is worth learning about.
There are many ways of calculating the value of e, but none of them ever give an exact reaction, because e is irrational (not the ratio of two integers).
But it is known to over 1 trillion digits of accuracy!
For example, the value of (1 + 1/n) n approaches e as n gets fatter and fatter:
The value of e is also equal to 1/0! + 1/1! + 1/Two! + 1/Three! + 1/Four! + 1/Five! + 1/6! + 1/7! + . (etc)
The very first few terms add up to: 1 + 1 + 1/Two + 1/6 + 1/24 + 1/120 = Two.718055556
And you can attempt that yourself at Sigma Calculator.
To recall the value of e (to Ten places) just reminisce this telling (count the letters!):
Or you can reminisce the nosey pattern that after the ",Two.7", the number ",1828", emerges TWICE:
Two.7 1828 1828 45 90 45
(An instant way to seem truly brainy!)
An Interesting Property
Just for joy, attempt ",Cut Up Then Multiply",
Let us say that we cut a number into equal parts and then multiply those parts together.
Example: Cut 20 into Four lumps and multiply them:
Each ",chunk", is 20/Four = Five in size
Now, . how could we get the reaction to be as big as possible, what size should each chunk be?
Example continued: attempt Five chunks
Each ",chunk", is 20/Five = Four in size
Yes, the response is thicker! But is there a best size?
The response: make the parts ",e", (or as close to e as possible) in size.
The winner is the number closest to ",e",, in this case Two.Five.
Attempt it with another number yourself, say 100, . what do you get?
Advanced: Use of e in Compound Interest
Often the number e emerges in unexpected places.
For example, e is used in Continuous Compounding (for loans and investments):
Formula for Continuous Compounding
Why does that happen?
Well, the formula for Periodic Compounding is:
where FV = Future Value
PV = Present Value
r = annual interest rate (as a decimal)
n = number of periods
But what happens when the number of periods goes to infinity?
The response lies in the similarity inbetween:
By substituting x = n/r :
Which is just like the formula for e (as n approaches infinity), with an extra r as an exponent.
So, as x goes to infinity, then (1+(1/x)) xr goes to e r
And that is why e makes an appearance in interest calculations!